Wednesday, August 11, 2010

Wait... a legitimate NYT editorial?

Most of the unsigned op-eds in the NYT are predictable - anything Democrats do is good and anything Republicans do is bad. This means they're right when Democrats are right, and wrong when Democrats are wrong (I had initially written "right when Democrats are right and wrong when Republicans are right" but there are too many times when both parties are wrong...)
However, this morning's Times actually had a pro-derivatives article (for farming commodities). It's not particularly groundbreaking in content, but to record for history the fact that the unsigned op-eds in the NYT can have their own opinion, I present:

1 comment:

  1. Ah, if only... the piece is actually a signed op-ed written by a real life wheat farmer, not the NYT editorial board.